Memoirs. First things first: I have just read 3 would-be chapters of someone’s autobiography –the author being a distinguished science-related top expert here in the Philippines and abroad. I, as an agriculturist (UP Los Baños 1965) and an Editor In Chief (mechanical self-taught, 1975-1985; digital self-taught, 1985 to now) – asked the author to reboot the manuscript, no name-calling, no. This happened only on a Facebook chat, but the author did not welcome the editorial brusqueness – so, no deal! So, who lost?
(“Autobiography” from shutterstock.com,
“PC” from istockphoto.com)
The author is an expert in a crop that should actively be
cultivated by the Philippine government and not simply allowed to get by, by
itself. And, like that manuscript, that crop should be cultivated with much
expertise and not simply allowed to grow “naturally.” To coin terms, what I was
offering the would-be author was “organic editing” and not simply “chemical
editing” – 2 terms I invented right now.
In organic editing,
you consider crop and field; you look at branches, leaves & fruits; you dig
roots: Do they all connect to each other naturally – is the growth luxuriant?
In chemical editing,
you simply spray the chemicals called “English Grammar” and watch from which
leaves the bad ones will fall.
Elsewhere, “Acquiring
Editor” of a Canadian press Russell Smith
says “There are three main types of memoir” (26 July 2022, “The Trouble With
Memoirs.” Open Book, open-book.ca):
1.
Celebrity.
Someone who is famous for something.
2.
Unusual
subculture. Glamorous stories of (people) who did something wild.
3.
Trauma. “This
is what most beginner writers are trying to write: a story of dealing with
adverse circumstances.”
Now I can tell you that the 3 chapters I have read of that
would-be published memoir deal with trauma as described in #3 – Double Trauma: Dealing with tragic
personal life and dealing with tragic science.
“Now, many of these [trauma memoirs] do become best sellers.
The successful ones tend to share one or two attributes. They are
entertainingly written, for one. But they also usually go beyond the author’s
personal story to offer some kind of lesson or moral or reflection on a
societal problem.”
Some parts of those chapters I have read are poorly written.
But the author would not listen to me, so, goodbye!
I am very interested in that memoir because the author has
some solid experiences here and abroad about a societal problem – if I told you
the nature of that, you will be able to guess the would-be author of that
memoir.
In other words, there
is crossover between the trauma memoir and self-help: they both aim to offer
comfort, and I would argue their audiences are similar. So for your trauma
memoir to resonate, it has to offer some kind of philosophizing that applies
universally.
That’s
what’s lacking in that candidate memoir I was talking about. But the
author would not listen. S/He could not accept this truth: “While the Author is
Always Write – the Editor is Always Right!”@517
No comments:
Post a Comment